State v. Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that prosecutorial comments that are a fair rebuttal to areas opened by the defense are proper
• held that prior convictions used to enhance punishment under A.R.S. § 13-604 could also be used as an aggravating circumstance under A.R.S. § 13-702

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gillies
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 219×
• State v. LeMaster
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1983-04-12· cited 64×
• State v. Lara
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1992-04-02· cited 40×
• State v. Alvarez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 36×
• State v. Perea
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1984-11-01· cited 31×
• State v. Jackson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1981-07-06· cited 6×
• State v. Loney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2012-11-06· cited 4×
• State of Arizona v. Frank Joseph Sarullo
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2008-11-13

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-04-28· cited 4,680×
• Griffin v. California
  Supreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,088×
• State v. Bly
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1980-11-18· cited 107×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-01-17· cited 10×