Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/16/1996
State v. Lapointe
Citations
- 237 Conn. 694
- 678 A.2d 942
- 1996 Conn. LEXIS 261
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendant was not in custody where he was allowed to leave station when interview completed
- conviction for rape-murder; aggravating factor — grave risk to others; mitigating factor — found but unspecified; sentenced to life in prison
- false statement that defendant’s fingerprints had been found on weapon did not render defendant’s statement involuntary
- \The defendant bears the burden of proving custodial interrogation\ when a motion to suppress an in-custody statement is filed.
- detective informed suspect that suspect’s prints had been found on handle of knife used to stab the victim, even though no prints had actually been found; confession determined voluntary
- defendant’s request to use telephone did not sufficiently invoke right to counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Callahan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-03· cited 182×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- State v. BlankSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2007-04-11· cited 154×
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1997-08-20· cited 141×
- State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-04-24· cited 129×
- State v. SchiappaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-03-23· cited 122×
- State v. PinderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 103×
- State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-07-14· cited 99×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-02· cited 89×
- State v. CorreaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-06-10· cited 87×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-06-01· cited 85×
- State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-10-12· cited 68×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-01-20· cited 40×
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2000-07-17· cited 36×
- State v. AnonymousSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-06· cited 33×
- State v. MiddletonWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2007-01-08· cited 31×
- State v. BrittonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-08-21· cited 29×
- State v. DowneyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1997-05-13· cited 23×
- State v. GriffinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2021-07-22· cited 22×
Cites
72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 5,425×
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court· 1986-12-10· cited 4,016×
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 3,849×
- California v. GreenSupreme Court· 1970-06-23· cited 3,363×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- Lego v. TwomeySupreme Court· 1972-01-12· cited 1,930×
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court· 1985-12-03· cited 1,743×
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 1,468×
- People v. HuntleyNew York Court of Appeals· 1965-01-07· cited 908×
- Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 906×
- Withrow v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 655×
- State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-20· cited 352×
- Jones v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-11-28· cited 325×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1994-04-21· cited 199×
- State v. GallowaySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-08-02· cited 192×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.