Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/21/2007
State v. Britton
Citations
- 929 A.2d 312
- 283 Conn. 598
- 2007 Conn. LEXIS 339
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining invitation to apply plain error doctrine because party failed to explain why claim merited such an extraordinary remedy
- declining invitation to apply plain error doctrine because party failed to explain why claim merited such extraordinary remedy
- declining invitation to apply plain error doctrine because party failed to explain why claim merited such an extraordinary remedy
- defendant not in custody although asked to accompany detectives to police station for questioning
- court deems it relevant that defendant “not handcuffed or subjected to force”
- court deems it relevant that defendant “not handcuffed or subjected to force”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Borden, Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella, Sullivan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Connecticut Light and Power Co. v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-10-21· cited 48×
- State v. ForemanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-09-16· cited 21×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 21×
- State v. KimbleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-25· cited 20×
- State v. HasfalConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-03-04· cited 7×
- Robert J. Barnabei Contracting, LLC v. Greater Hartford Jewish Community Center, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-03-29· cited 7×
- State v. Jerrell R.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2019-01-29· cited 7×
- State v. GuzmanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2010-11-30· cited 5×
- State v. TierinniConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-07-16· cited 5×
- State v. ReadConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-11-01· cited 4×
- State v. MitchellConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-06-10· cited 4×
- State v. PaganConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-04-15· cited 3×
- In re Zakai F.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2018-10-30· cited 3×
- State v. DoyleConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-11-27· cited 3×
- State v. AcamporaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2017-09-05· cited 2×
- Britton v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-04-02· cited 2×
- State v. MangualSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-03-04
- State v. Marrero-AlejandroConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-08-25
- State v. PierreConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-09-14
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,680×
- California v. BehelerSupreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 2,048×
- Henderson v. KibbeSupreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 1,629×
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1966-11-21· cited 1,416×
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-03-03· cited 182×
- State v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-12-07· cited 117×
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-01-23· cited 109×
- State v. PinderSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-08-24· cited 103×
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-10-17· cited 92×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-07-18· cited 85×
- State v. PackardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-05-26· cited 84×
- State v. TomaskoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-23· cited 73×
- State v. LapointeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-16· cited 70×
- State v. D'AntonioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-08-02· cited 65×
- State v. NorthropSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-01-09· cited 62×
- Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-03-13· cited 62×
- Kalama Services, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, Department of LaborSupreme Court· 2004-10-04· cited 44×
- State v. TurnerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-01-20· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.