Supreme Court of Connecticut· 7/26/1994
State v. Ross
Citations
- 230 Conn. 183
- 646 A.2d 1318
- 1994 Conn. LEXIS 227
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a valid death penalty statute must focus the sentencer's attention on the character and record of the individual offender and the circumstances of the particular offense
- upholding language that “proof which leaves you with a strong and abiding conviction that the accused is guilty”
- holding torture may be psychological as well as physical
- rejecting claim that death penalty is cruel and unusual in all circumstances
- turning to common law to aid in interpreting § 53a-54b [5]
- relying on date of offense in retroactivity analysis of change in statutory law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Berdon, Peters
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
126 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-03-08· cited 294×
- Connecticut v. PorterSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-20· cited 268×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-12-28· cited 228×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 214×
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-03-11· cited 204×
- State v. WalkerTennessee Supreme Court· 1995-09-18· cited 200×
- State v. GalesNebraska Court of Appeals· 2005-03-18· cited 200×
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-12-07· cited 167×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-12-19· cited 163×
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-10-12· cited 157×
- Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-08-26· cited 128×
- State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-14· cited 127×
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-10-28· cited 111×
- State v. TrineSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-03-12· cited 110×
- State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-01-23· cited 109×
- State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1995-06-27· cited 107×
- State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-05-06· cited 102×
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-03-17· cited 98×
- State v. HodgeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-04-06· cited 96×
Cites
258 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-04-23· cited 3,699×
- Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court· 1991-09-13· cited 3,458×
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1985-02-26· cited 3,332×
- Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court· 1982-01-19· cited 3,271×
- Herrera v. CollinsSupreme Court· 1993-01-25· cited 3,060×
- Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court· 1989-06-26· cited 2,957×
- Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,907×
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-06-11· cited 2,827×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1994-04-26· cited 2,603×
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- West Virginia State Board of Education v. BarnetteSupreme Court· 1943-06-14· cited 2,477×
- Zant v. StephensSupreme Court· 1983-06-22· cited 2,410×
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 2,369×
- Trop v. DullesSupreme Court· 1958-03-31· cited 2,182×
- Pulley v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 2,080×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.