New York Court of Appeals· 1/7/1965

People v. Huntley

Citations

15 N.Y.2d 72
204 N.E.2d 179
255 N.Y.S.2d 838
1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1680

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

providing a criminal defendant prosecution claim because it was not terminated in Plaintiff's with a pre-trial hearing to determine whether statements are favor. Accordingly, based on the undisputed facts, Plaintiff's admissible
absent controlling decision, statute or rule, state must establish voluntariness of confession beyond reasonable doubt
absent controlling decision, statute or rule, state must establish voluntariness of confession beyond reasonable doubt
trial court must conduct pretrial hearing to determine voluntariness of defendant's statements to be used as evidence at trial
a shorthand reference to the hearing held in New York on a challenge to the admissibility of statements made to law enforcement personnel
a shorthand reference to the hearing held in New York on a challenge to the admissibility of statements made to law enforcement personnel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Desmond, Voorhis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

617 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Huntley

24 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.