Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/10/1997

State v. Correa

Citations

241 Conn. 322
696 A.2d 944
1997 Conn. LEXIS 180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“In Schad, the United States Supreme Court deferred to the states’ determination that certain statutory alternatives are mere means of committing a single offense.”
“it is well established that the principle of Doyle ... is not violated in situations . . . where the defendant has chosen not to remain silent” [citation omitted]
in determining whether defendant had notice of charges against him, “[w]e do not read each count specified in the substitute information . . . in isola- tion”
‘‘[a] [Miranda] warning at the time of the interrogation is indispensable to overcome its pressures and to [e]nsure that the individual knows he is free to exercise the privilege at that point in time’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
prosecutor’s comment went toward weight of evidence rather than defendant’s refusal to testify
admission of statements by suspect with only five years of education

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berdon, McDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

75 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

93 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Correa

22 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.