Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/11/1990

State v. Jennings

Citations

216 Conn. 647
583 A.2d 915
1990 Conn. LEXIS 417

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that Bolts limited Gipson to cases in which the trial court expressly instructed the jury that a non-unanimous verdict was permissible
holding that Bolts limited Gipson to cases in which the trial court expressly instructed the jury that a non-unanimous verdict was permissible
concluding that crimes of assault and kidnapping were not brutal and shocking in nature because “[t]he physical harm that was inflicted on the victim, although serious, was not disabling, and the element of sexual derangement present in Boscarino was absent”
holding that joinder of two assault charges involving same victim was proper
acknowledging right to unanimous verdict pro- tected by article first, § 8, of Connecticut constitu- tion
acknowledging right to unanimous verdict protected by article first, § 8, of Connecticut constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hull

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

77 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.