Skip to main content
· 5/17/1958

Ernest Kay v. United States

Citations

  • 255 F.2d 476
  • 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4221

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the ACA assimilates entire substantive law but does not generally adopt state procedural rules
  • duly-attested copy of certificate reporting alcoholic content of blood sample admissible as official record —no confrontation clause violation
  • Bogen’s test admissible under shop-book rule — alternative ground

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haynsworth, Sobeloff, Hayns-Worth, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.