Supreme Court of Connecticut· 6/5/1973
State v. Evans
Citations
- 165 Conn. 61
- 327 A.2d 576
- 1973 Conn. LEXIS 709
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- predecessor to Golding identified \`exceptional circumstance'\ that arises when \the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial\
- review will be made when an adequate record supports a claim of a clear deprivation of a fundamental constitutional right
- predecessor to Golding identified “ ‘exceptional circumstance’ ” that arises when “the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial”
- “[t]his claim raises an issue of constitutional dimensions and we find that it comes within the second exception which we have mentioned in that the record is sufficiently complete for us to consider it on its merits and it involves a fundamental constitutional right”
- “a claim not raised is deemed waived” absent “exceptional circumstances”
- “claim not raised is deemed waived” absent “exceptional circumstances”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: House, Shapiro, Loiselle, MacDonald, Bogdanski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
803 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 606×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-07-28· cited 498×
- State v. GeislerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-18· cited 496×
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-05-17· cited 407×
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-08-05· cited 393×
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1988-01-05· cited 298×
- Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-06-03· cited 271×
- Marsh, Day & Calhoun v. SolomonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-08-04· cited 248×
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2011-01-05· cited 242×
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-04-23· cited 231×
- State v. WhistnantSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-02-12· cited 230×
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-07-26· cited 228×
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-06-02· cited 193×
- State v. LeecanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-02-04· cited 192×
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-30· cited 191×
- State v. JanuszewskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-08-19· cited 184×
- State v. BadgettSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-07-08· cited 184×
- State v. HendersonWashington Supreme Court· 1990-06-14· cited 173×
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1985-12-17· cited 169×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.