Skip to main content

State v. Ellis

Citations

  • 270 Conn. 337
  • 852 A.2d 676
  • 2004 Conn. LEXIS 300

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that court abused discretion in consolidating cases of three victims ‘‘because the defendant’s abuse of [the first victim] was substantially more egregious than his abuse of the other two [victims]’’
  • holding court’s instructions to jury could not cure prejudice from testimony regarding prior uncharged sexual misconduct by defendant
  • limiting analysis “to the second, and only, Boscarino factor addressed by the defendant”
  • limiting analysis to second, and only, Boscarino factor addressed by defendant
  • \[r]eversal is required only where an abuse of discretion is manifest or where injustice appears to have been done\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • “ [reversal is required only where an abuse of discretion is manifest or where injustice appears to have been done” [internal quotation marks omitted]

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.