Supreme Court· 11/21/1966
Spencer v. Texas
Citations
- 385 U.S. 554
- 87 S. Ct. 648
- 17 L. Ed. 2d 606
- 1967 U.S. LEXIS 2453
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that admission of evidence of prior felonies at the guilt phase of a trial does not violate due process
- holding that state statutes requiring juries to make findings of prior convictions in single trials do not violate due process
- holding that admission of evidence of prior felonies at the guilt phase of a trial does not violate due process
- holding that the admission of improper propensity evidence violates due process if there is a reasonable probability that the evidence affected the verdict
- holding that there is no federal constitutional right to a bifurcated criminal trial
- holding that there is no federal constitutional right to a bifurcated criminal trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stewart, Warren, Brennan, Harlan, Fortas, Douglas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
943 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-24· cited 12,622×
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court· 1991-12-04· cited 8,719×
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 8,442×
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court· 1989-04-17· cited 6,602×
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court· 1978-07-03· cited 5,026×
- Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,797×
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 3,510×
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 3,395×
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court· 1987-04-21· cited 2,670×
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court· 1980-03-18· cited 2,234×
- McMillan v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1986-06-19· cited 1,908×
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court· 1967-11-13· cited 1,632×
- People v. BrevermanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1998-08-31· cited 1,626×
- Marshall v. LonbergerSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 1,618×
- McCray v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1967-04-24· cited 1,521×
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 1,409×
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 1,403×
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,330×
Cites
72 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-04-29· cited 3,330×
- Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 3,002×
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 1934-01-08· cited 2,822×
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court· 1927-03-14· cited 2,714×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals· 1901-10-15· cited 2,413×
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court· 1951-04-30· cited 1,907×
- Michelson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-02-14· cited 1,808×
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court· 1962-02-19· cited 1,736×
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,725×
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 1,662×
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court· 1961-03-20· cited 1,412×
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-03-28· cited 1,293×
- Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1954-12-06· cited 1,280×
- Betts v. BradySupreme Court· 1942-06-01· cited 1,154×
- Leland v. OregonSupreme Court· 1952-10-13· cited 1,010×
Other cases named Spencer v. Texas
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.