Robert G. Baker v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a defendant must make a convincing showing that “he has both important testimony to give concerning one count and a strong need to refrain from testifying on the other”
• CPA and his employer jointly indicted under § 7206(2)
• the principal elements of prejudice from a joint trial are largely absent in a situation where evidence of each of the joined offenses would be admissible in a separate trial for the other, under the rules governing admissibility of “other crimes” evidence
• elucidating the “essence of [the] ruling in Cross”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).