Skip to main content

State v. Jones

Citations

  • 541 S.E.2d 813
  • 343 S.C. 562
  • 2001 S.C. LEXIS 20

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding any evidence that shows the accuracy, truthfulness, or sincerity of a witness may be admissible to help the factfinder determine the witness's credibility
  • holding a jury instruction explaining, “A reasonable doubt is the kind of doubt that would cause a reasonable person to hesitate to act” was “a correct statement of South Carolina law.”
  • finding testimony which singled out defendant as a murder suspect merely because of reports he held a “grudge” inadmissible
  • finding error in the trial court’s decision to admit “unreliable” expert evidence
  • stating “generally, ‘anything having a legitimate tendency to throw light on the accuracy, truthfulness, and sincerity of a witness may be shown and considered in determining the credit to be accorded his testimony’ ”
  • applying this rule of evidence to bias under Rule 608(c), SCRE

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pleicones, Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.