Supreme Court of South Carolina· 8/10/2009
State v. Jones
Citations
- 681 S.E.2d 580
- 383 S.C. 535
- 2009 S.C. LEXIS 328
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- despite fact that other jurisdictions had permitted same witness to testify as expert in area, trial court abused its discretion in admitting the evidence
- despite fact that other jurisdictions had permitted same witness to testify as expert in area, trial court abused its discretion in admitting the evidence
- “Taken to its extreme, we believe such a rule could be used by the State as a subversive tactic to circumvent discovery rules.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beatty, Waller, Kittredge, Moore, Pleicones
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 157×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-10-11· cited 85×
- Commonwealth v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-06-21· cited 77×
- State v. ReevesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 75×
- State v. MingoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1978-07-26· cited 60×
- United States v. FerriThird Circuit· 1985-12-10· cited 55×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-24· cited 41×
- State v. NorthcuttSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2007-02-20· cited 38×
- Hurrelbrink v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2001-04-04· cited 23×
- Morris v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1984-07-16· cited 16×
- United States v. WalkerN.D. New York· 1995-11-28· cited 16×
- Thiel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-10-14· cited 13×
- People v. SpiezerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-08-22· cited 13×
- Matthew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2007-02-02· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.