State v. Saltz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding where trial court does not sustain objection, no additional action required to preserve issue for review
• holding an appellate court may affirm a trial court’s decision based on any reason appearing in the record on appeal
• finding that the State’s questions of a defense witness regarding her coming forward 13 days before trial and her romantic relationship with the defendant charged the witness with both fabrication and improper motive
• finding that the State's questions of a defense witness regarding her coming forward 13 days before trial and her romantic relationship with the defendant charged the witness with both fabrication and improper motive
• finding a motion to strike was unnecessary because the objection to the hearsay testimony had been overruled
• holding an appellate court must affirm the denial of a motion for directed verdict where evidence exists which reasonably tends to prove the defendant’s guilt or with which his guilt may be logically deduced

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).