Skip to main content

State v. White

Citations

  • 676 S.E.2d 684
  • 382 S.C. 265
  • 2009 S.C. LEXIS 98

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that all expert evidence must satisfy Rule 702, both in terms of expert qualifications and reliability of the subject matter
  • holding that the Council factors provided no useful analytical framework to evaluate the reliability of expert dog tracking evidence
  • holding that the Council factors provided no useful analytical framework to evaluate the reliability of expert dog tracking evidence
  • holding that all expert evidence must satisfy Rule 702, both in terms of expert qualifications and reliability of the subject matter
  • holding that the trial court properly instructed the jury that they were to give expert dog handler’s testimony such weight and credi bility as they deemed appropriate as with any and all witnesses testifying at trial
  • stating that for non-scientific expert testimony to be admissible, the qualifications of the expert must be sufficient, and that there must be a determination that the expert’s testimony will be reliable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kittredge, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Burnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.