Supreme Court of South Carolina· 4/27/2009
State v. White
Citations
- 676 S.E.2d 684
- 382 S.C. 265
- 2009 S.C. LEXIS 98
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that all expert evidence must satisfy Rule 702, both in terms of expert qualifications and reliability of the subject matter
- holding that the Council factors provided no useful analytical framework to evaluate the reliability of expert dog tracking evidence
- holding that the Council factors provided no useful analytical framework to evaluate the reliability of expert dog tracking evidence
- holding that all expert evidence must satisfy Rule 702, both in terms of expert qualifications and reliability of the subject matter
- holding that the trial court properly instructed the jury that they were to give expert dog handler’s testimony such weight and credi bility as they deemed appropriate as with any and all witnesses testifying at trial
- stating that for non-scientific expert testimony to be admissible, the qualifications of the expert must be sufficient, and that there must be a determination that the expert’s testimony will be reliable
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kittredge, Toal, Waller, Pleicones, Burnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Watson v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-09-13· cited 86×
- Austin v. Stokes-Craven Holding Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-03-08· cited 60×
- State v. ChavisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-02-04· cited 60×
- State v. TappSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-06-06· cited 45×
- State v. CopeSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2013-08-28· cited 40×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2018-07-05· cited 33×
- Pope v. Heritage Communities, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-09-14· cited 30×
- Graves v. Cas Medical Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2012-12-12· cited 20×
- State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-02-03· cited 13×
- Risher v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-06-20· cited 13×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-02-15· cited 12×
- Jamison v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-09-21· cited 10×
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-06-01· cited 10×
- Hamrick v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2019-05-15· cited 9×
- Wright v. HIESTER CONST. CO., INC.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-07-21· cited 8×
- State v. CommanderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-11· cited 6×
- State v. MealorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-08-15· cited 6×
- Wright v. Hiester Construction Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-07-21· cited 4×
- State v. TappCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2010-02-18· cited 3×
- State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-07-18· cited 2×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court· 1999-03-23· cited 8,651×
- State v. CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-05· cited 157×
- State v. SchumpertSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1993-08-23· cited 136×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1979-10-11· cited 85×
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-04-17· cited 63×
- State v. ChildsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-11-13· cited 54×
- State v. WhaleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-07-08· cited 43×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-24· cited 41×
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-03-19· cited 37×
- State v. MercerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 36×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-01-16· cited 19×
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-04-07· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.