Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 451 S.E.2d 888
  • 317 S.C. 55
  • 1994 S.C. LEXIS 212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \an out of court statement is not hearsay if it is offered for the limited purpose of explaining why a government investigation was undertaken\
  • holding police officers' testimony regarding complaints they had received prior to establishing surveillance of defendant's residence was nonhearsay because it was admitted to explain why officers began their surveillance
  • holding the police officers' testimony about complaints they received from declarants in the neighborhood, prior to setting up surveillance, was admissible for the nonhearsay purpose of explaining why the officers began surveillance of the defendant's apartment
  • explaining “an out of court statement is not hearsay if it is offered for the limited purpose of explaining why a government investigation was undertaken” and “these statements were not entered for their truth but rather to explain why the officers began their surveillance”
  • burden on challenger to prove statute violates Equal Protection Clause
  • hearsay statements to explain investigation are not admitted for truth

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Chandler, Finney, Moore, Waller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.