Supreme Court of South Carolina· 12/12/1994
State v. Brown
Citations
- 451 S.E.2d 888
- 317 S.C. 55
- 1994 S.C. LEXIS 212
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding \an out of court statement is not hearsay if it is offered for the limited purpose of explaining why a government investigation was undertaken\
- holding police officers' testimony regarding complaints they had received prior to establishing surveillance of defendant's residence was nonhearsay because it was admitted to explain why officers began their surveillance
- holding the police officers' testimony about complaints they received from declarants in the neighborhood, prior to setting up surveillance, was admissible for the nonhearsay purpose of explaining why the officers began surveillance of the defendant's apartment
- explaining “an out of court statement is not hearsay if it is offered for the limited purpose of explaining why a government investigation was undertaken” and “these statements were not entered for their truth but rather to explain why the officers began their surveillance”
- burden on challenger to prove statute violates Equal Protection Clause
- hearsay statements to explain investigation are not admitted for truth
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Chandler, Finney, Moore, Waller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Caprood v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-01-04· cited 86×
- Commonwealth v. RosarioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1999-12-30· cited 68×
- State v. PriceSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-04-17· cited 63×
- State v. HicksSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-04-27· cited 60×
- State v. CurtisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-01-05· cited 54×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-01-06· cited 47×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-24· cited 41×
- STALK v. RiceCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-10-05· cited 32×
- State v. VickCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-25· cited 30×
- State v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-08-10· cited 29×
- State v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-04-28· cited 25×
- Johnson v. Collins Entertainment Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-28· cited 22×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-03-27· cited 21×
- State v. BarrosoCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-06-12· cited 16×
- Rhodes v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 15×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2015-04-22· cited 15×
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-03-04· cited 14×
- State v. WeaverCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-09-07· cited 14×
- State v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-12-23· cited 12×
- Abbeville County School District v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-04-22· cited 12×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 2,187×
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-24· cited 97×
- State v. CrenshawSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-04-09· cited 40×
- Brown v. County of HorrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-04-13· cited 22×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-07-21· cited 22×
- Blandon v. ColemanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-05-16· cited 19×
- Davis v. County of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-04-04· cited 18×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-04-25· cited 11×
- Mitchell v. OwensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-04· cited 6×
- Rainey v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-01-27· cited 6×
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1990-10-08· cited 6×
- State v. PriceLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-10-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.