Skip to main content
· 11/13/2000

State v. Aleksey

Citations

  • 538 S.E.2d 248
  • 343 S.C. 20
  • 2000 S.C. LEXIS 219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an appellate court should consider jury instructions as a whole
  • indicating that violations of narcotics laws are generally not probative of truthfulness
  • holding the trial court's improper \remarks were prefaced by a full instruction on reasonable doubt and followed by an additional exhortation to bear in mind the State's heavy burden of proof\
  • holding an appellate court may affirm for any reason appearing in the record
  • stating an appellate court may affirm for any reason appearing in the record on appeal
  • stating an appellate court may affirm for any reason appearing in the record on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burnett, Toal, Moore, Waller, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.