Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1/6/2003
State v. Adkins
Citations
- 577 S.E.2d 460
- 353 S.C. 312
- 2003 S.C. App. LEXIS 5
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating an appellate court will not disturb the circuit court's admissibility determinations absent a prejudicial abuse of discretion
- \A jury charge which is substantially correct and covers the law does not require reversal.\
- “In reviewing jury charges for error, we must consider the [trial] court’s jury charge as a whole in light of the evidence and issues presented at trial.” (citations omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Hearn, Cureton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MattisonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-08-09· cited 108×
- State v. BrandtSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-07-25· cited 97×
- State v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-21· cited 60×
- State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-06-06· cited 58×
- State v. MartucciCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-09-24· cited 54×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 51×
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-23· cited 33×
- State v. KirtonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-12-17· cited 32×
- State v. MarinSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-03-23· cited 30×
- State v. StatenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 25×
- State v. Lee-GriggCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-04-16· cited 22×
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-10-09· cited 12×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-07-20· cited 8×
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-02-24· cited 7×
- State v. DantonioCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-01-16· cited 7×
- State v. OttsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-06-27· cited 6×
- State v. MedleyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2016-06-15· cited 6×
- State v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-01-23· cited 4×
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2012-04-25· cited 4×
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-02-28· cited 3×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-13· cited 273×
- State v. SaltzSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-08-06· cited 162×
- Welch v. EpsteinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-07-31· cited 146×
- In Re the Care & Treatment of McCrackenSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-07-23· cited 107×
- State v. ShulerSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-16· cited 104×
- State v. SimsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-24· cited 97×
- State v. HoffmanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-24· cited 90×
- State v. BurkhartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-06-17· cited 83×
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-27· cited 82×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-06-20· cited 79×
- Keaton Ex Rel. Foster v. GREENVILLE HOSP.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-01· cited 75×
- State v. HugheySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-03-27· cited 68×
- State v. BrazellSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-01-13· cited 63×
- State v. FoustSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-12-02· cited 63×
- State v. StromanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1984-05-21· cited 59×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-03-25· cited 52×
- State v. WhippleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 50×
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-09-09· cited 50×
- State v. LangleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-03-22· cited 48×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.