Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 6/15/2010
State v. Baker
Citations
- 700 S.E.2d 440
- 390 S.C. 56
- 2010 S.C. App. LEXIS 92
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding constitutional claims must be raised at trial to be preserved for review
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Short, Huff, Williams
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DunbarSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-10-13· cited 513×
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- State v. GentrySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-03-07· cited 229×
- State v. GasterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-05-20· cited 178×
- State v. DouglasSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-01-12· cited 48×
- State v. StarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-08· cited 45×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-01-24· cited 41×
- State v. LytchfieldSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-01-02· cited 41×
- State v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-01-23· cited 33×
- State v. TumblestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2007-11-27· cited 31×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1991-08-12· cited 28×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1995-03-27· cited 21×
- State v. HenryCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1997-12-15· cited 15×
- State v. AddisonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-12-06· cited 9×
- State v. NicholsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2005-12-05· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.