State v. Cheeseboro

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding remote convictions for housebreaking and grand larceny were properly excluded under the ten-year limit of Rule 609(b
• \The State does not have an absolute duty to preserve potentially useful evidence that might exonerate a defendant.\
• \The State does not have an absolute duty to preserve potentially useful evidence that might exonerate a defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).