Arizona Supreme Court· 5/3/1996

State v. Jackson

Citations

918 P.2d 1038
186 Ariz. 20
216 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 9
1996 Ariz. LEXIS 137
1996 WL 222366

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

finding that, in addition to chronological age, we must consider a defendant’s: (1) level of intelligence, (2) maturity, (3) participation in the murder, and (4) criminal history and past experience with law enforcement
describing how defendant sang a rap song both immediately after killing his victim and then after showing a picture of the victim's children to his co-defendant
describing how defendant sang a rap song both immediately after killing his victim and then after showing a picture of the victim’s children to his co-defendant
rejecting challenge to death penalty under article 2, section 15 and ascribing to it “the same meaning” as Eighth Amendment “where the parties do not argue otherwise”
rejecting challenge to death penalty under article 2, section 15 and ascribing to it \the same meaning\ as Eighth Amendment \where the parties do not argue otherwise\
reviewing a court’s “imposition and choice of sanction” for an abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corcoran, Feldman, Martone, Moeller, Robert, Zlaket

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.