Skip to main content

State v. Ring

Citations

  • 25 P.3d 1139
  • 200 Ariz. 267
  • 350 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 5
  • 2001 Ariz. LEXIS 90

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that Apprendi did not overrule Walton
  • finding that Apprendi did not overrule Walton
  • “[Kjilling Magoch was for no other comprehensible reason than to facilitate the robbery.”
  • \[K]illing Magoch was for no other comprehensible reason than to facilitate the robbery.\
  • a trial court’s exclusion of third-party culpability evidence does not constitute harmful error if the evidence “would not have exculpated Defendant for his role in both planning and committing the crimes”
  • referring to a \separate evidentiary hearing\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Feldman, Martone, Zlaket, Jones, McGregor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

83 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.