Supreme Court· 12/10/1984
United States v. Abel
Citations
- 469 U.S. 45
- 105 S. Ct. 465
- 83 L. Ed. 2d 450
- 1984 U.S. LEXIS 164
- 53 U.S.L.W. 4009
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Federal Rules of Evidence permit the impeachment of a witness by showing bias
- holding that the use of evidence of bias to impeach a witness is permissible
- holding that: a witness’s fear of a party is evidence of bias; a witness’s bias is highly probative of her credibility; and this high probative value may outweigh corresponding prejudice
- holding that the Federal Rules of Evidence permit impeachment of a witness showing bias
- holding that evidence showing shared gang membership is “sufficiently probative of [witness’s] bias towards [defendant] to warrant its admission into evidence”
- deciding that gang membership was “sufficiently probative of ... possible bias ... to warrant its admission into evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rehnquist
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
603 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court· 1992-05-07· cited 8,808×
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court· 1997-12-15· cited 4,535×
- Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-01-07· cited 2,913×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- United States v. Richard Junior FrazierEleventh Circuit· 2004-10-15· cited 1,229×
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-27· cited 931×
- Sprint/United Management Co. v. MendelsohnSupreme Court· 2008-02-26· cited 584×
- Lore v. City of SyracuseSecond Circuit· 2012-02-02· cited 573×
- Tome v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1995-01-10· cited 570×
- Aaron Lindh v. James P. Murphy, WardenSeventh Circuit· 1996-09-12· cited 550×
- Dawson v. DelawareSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 544×
- United States v. Lavern Hankey, AKA Poo, OpinionNinth Circuit· 2000-02-18· cited 496×
- Goodyear Tire and Rubber Co. v. ThompsonKentucky Supreme Court· 2000-02-24· cited 491×
- People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court· 1998-07-28· cited 478×
- Hoops v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1996-08-22· cited 454×
- Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2000-02-14· cited 395×
- Carmelita Elcock v. Kmart CorporationThird Circuit· 2000-11-20· cited 342×
- United States v. GibbsSixth Circuit· 1999-04-16· cited 299×
- United States v. GreenThird Circuit· 2010-08-09· cited 298×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc.Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 1,564×
- Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court· 1969-06-09· cited 1,379×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court· 1943-03-01· cited 1,191×
- Scales v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-06-19· cited 526×
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-11-06· cited 477×
- Funk v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1933-12-11· cited 406×
- District of Columbia v. ClawansSupreme Court· 1937-04-05· cited 381×
- United States v. Leonard James and Otto SeboldSecond Circuit· 1979-12-18· cited 106×
- United States v. Garnell S. RobinsonD.C. Circuit· 1976-02-20· cited 67×
- United States v. Robert Blackwood and Tobias CohenSecond Circuit· 1972-03-01· cited 63×
- United States v. Betty FrankenthalSeventh Circuit· 1978-08-15· cited 50×
- United States v. Larry Wayne Brown, United States of America v. Larry Edward HendrixEighth Circuit· 1977-01-17· cited 47×
- United States v. Ronald William HarveySecond Circuit· 1976-11-24· cited 39×
Other cases named United States v. Abel
5 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.