· 10/7/2022
State v. Hayden
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 3574
Syllabus
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's Crim.R. 33 motion for leave to file a delayed motion for new trial where his motion was barred by res judicata and he failed to submit clear and convincing proof that he had been unavoidably prevented from filing his motion for a new trial within the required time limits. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.