State v. Hayden

Citations

• 2020 Ohio 3818

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in entering summary judgment against the appellant on his pro se \Motion to Void Judgment and Set Aside Conviction.\ The appellant's filing constituted an untimely, successive petition for post-conviction relief. Moreover, the filing failed on its merits as it did not establish that a prosecution witness presented \false\ testimony during the appellant's 1990 rape trial. In any event, res judicata precluded the appellant from raising this issue. Judgment affirmed.