Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 8/28/2002

State v. Hayden

Citations

  • 2002 Ohio 4169
  • 96 Ohio St. 3d 211

Syllabus

Criminal law—Sex offenders—Confrontation Clauses of Sixth Amendment to United States Constitution and Section 10, Article I of the Ohio Constitution do not apply to R.C. Chapter 2950—Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Section 16, Article I of the Ohio Constitution do not require that trial court conduct a hearing to determine whether a defendant is a sexually oriented offender—Sexually oriented offender designation attaches as a matter of law, when.

Judges: Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

67 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.