Supreme Court of Kansas· 3/17/2006

State v. Hayden

Citations

281 Kan. 112
130 P.3d 24
2006 Kan. LEXIS 136

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that consideration of the remaining Barker factors is unnecessary when the defendant fails to 32 establish that the delay was presumptively prejudicial
noting \[w]hether a defendant's constitutional right to a speedy trial has been violated is a question of law\ and applying Barker
“In order to warrant a new trial, it must affirmatively appear that the conduct prejudiced the substantial rights of the complaining party.”
standard of review on appeal whether viewed in light most favorable to prosecution, rational factfinder could have found guilt beyond reasonable doubt
standard of review on appeal whether viewed in light most favorable to prosecution, rational factfinder could have found guilt beyond reasonable doubt
13-month delay not presumptively prejudicial when crimes were second-degree murder, second-degree attempted murder, and aggravated burglary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beier, McFarland, Gernon, Luckert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.