State v. Hayden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• inadmissible hearsay identification testimony constituted reversible error although the out-of-court assertion was made in the presence of the defendant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Smith
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-06-21· cited 35×
• State v. Ford
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-06-21· cited 31×
• State v. Carey
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1993-12-01· cited 26×
• State v. Arbuthnot
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1979-01-29· cited 23×
• State v. Michelli
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1974-10-11· cited 23×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1976-05-14· cited 18×
• State v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1975-02-24· cited 18×
• State v. McClain
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1969-05-05· cited 12×
• State v. Broussard
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1980-12-15· cited 11×
• State v. Jacobs
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1977-04-06· cited 10×
• State v. Pagnotta
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1969-02-24· cited 10×
• State v. Tytus
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1970-11-09· cited 9×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Rini
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1922-12-29· cited 22×
• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1901-11-15· cited 13×
• State v. Ricks
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1962-02-19· cited 5×
• State v. Robinson
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1899-02-20· cited 5×
• State v. Cooper
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1961-05-29· cited 2×
• State v. Joseph
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1924-06-20· cited 2×