Ohio Supreme Court· 7/30/1996

State v. Hochhausler

Citations

76 Ohio St. 3d 455
668 N.E.2d 457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a driver has a protected property interest in his or her driver’s license
“Inherent within a court’s jurisdiction, and essential to the orderly and efficient administration of justice, is the power to grant or deny stays”
“Prior to severing a portion of a statute, [a court] must first 8 determine that the severa[nce] will not fundamentally disrupt the statutory scheme of which the unconstitutional provision is a part.”
discussing due process under Ohio Constitution
discussing due process under Ohio Constitution
using the term “essentially connected”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cook, Douglas, Eighth, Karpinski, Moyer, Patton, Pfeifer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Hochhausler

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.