Skip to main content

State v. Hayden

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 3574

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's Crim.R. 33 motion for leave to file a delayed motion for new trial where his motion was barred by res judicata and he failed to submit clear and convincing proof that he had been unavoidably prevented from filing his motion for a new trial within the required time limits. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Lewis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.