State v. Hayden

Citations

• 2017 Ohio 9308

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in overruling the appellant's motion for a new trial. The motion related to the appellant's 1990 rape conviction and was extremely untimely. The motion also was not based on any newly-discovered evidence, and the appellant did not seek leave to file the motion. Finally, the arguments the appellant raised were barred by res judicata because they were or could have been raised decades ago on direct appeal. Judgment affirmed.