Ohio Supreme Court· 7/13/2011

State v. Williams

Citations

2011 OH 3374
952 N.E.2d 1108
129 Ohio St. 3d 344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the Ohio Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause was violated because the statute required registration and updates in person and the statute precluded judicial review of sex offender classification
holding unconstitutional the retroactive application of the 2007 Ohio Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act
holding sex offender registration law was punitive for purposes of retroactivity analysis
additional requirement prohibited “all classified sex offenders, not just those convicted of sex offenses against children, from residing within 1,000 feet of any school premises”
amendment that increased length of registration period violated state ex post facto prohibition when applied to a defendant who committed the crime before effective date of amendment
amendment that increased length of registration period violated state ex post facto prohibition when applied to a defendant who committed the crime before effective date of amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pfeifer, O'Connor, Stratton, Lanzinger, Brown, O'Donnell, Cupp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

333 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.