Skip to main content

State v. Ellison

Citations

  • 239 S.W.3d 603
  • 2007 Mo. LEXIS 166
  • 2007 WL 4239066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling Section 566.025 unconstitutional because it impermissibly allowed propensity evidence
  • superseded by Mo. Const., art. I, sec. 18(c)
  • indicating section 566.025 codified the requirement of legal relevance
  • same as to Missouri Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael A. Wolff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.