State v. Ellison
Citations
- 19 N.M. 428
- 144 P. 10
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. In a prosecution for rape, when details of the woman’s ■complaints to others have been elicited on cross-examination, these details may he more fully developed on redirect examination.</p> <p>P. 434</p> <p>2. The complaints of an outraged female may, or may not, he a part of the res gestae of the offense. The fact that the -details of a complaint are elicited from an outraged child by ■questions does not necessarily rob it of its voluntary character. In this case the recital of this child prosecutrix to her mother and others within ten minutes after the commission of the offense, although given in response to questions, held to be voluntary and admissible.</p> <p>P. 438</p> <p>3. A physician testified as an expert that the ordinary male organ could produce such, a condition as was found, present in the prosecutrix. Held, the evidence was properly admitted.</p> <p>P. 439</p> <p>4. Defendant closed his case without testifying, and the prosecution dismissed three witnesses held in reserve for rebuttal of his testimony who had left town. The next morning defendant moved to reopen the case for the purpose of testifying. Held, the court properly refused to reopen the case-under the circumstances.</p> <p>P. 441.</p> <p>5. A motion for an instructed verdict, based upon an erroneous view of the law, was properly overruled.</p> <p>- P. 441</p> <p>6. Where no foundation for impeachment of a witness is laid on cross-examination, impeaching evidence in rebuttal is properly excluded.</p> <p>P. 442</p> <p>7. Under a statute prescribing a certain penalty for a certain offense, it is not necessary for the court to inform the-jury as to the statutory penalty, the sole question for the jury being whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty.</p> <p>P. 442</p> <p>8. Instructions to the jury are to be considered as a whole- and where, so considered, they fully protect the defendant, he cannot complain.</p> <p>P. 442</p> <p>9. Where an assignment of e
Judges: Paekee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Beausoliel v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1939-10-16· cited 154×
- Ewing v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1942-12-01· cited 136×
- State v. KiddNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-08-24· cited 51×
- State v. BealNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-02-14· cited 44×
- State v. PolskyNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1971-02-05· cited 40×
- State v. KingArizona Supreme Court· 1947-07-07· cited 38×
- Laurie R. v. New Mexico Human Services DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 1988-06-14· cited 37×
- State v. SandersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1950-12-09· cited 34×
- State v. NevaresNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1932-01-27· cited 30×
- State v. StewartNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1929-02-09· cited 27×
- State v. GambuttiNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1955-06-14· cited 26×
- State v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1927-01-07· cited 25×
- State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1917-08-27· cited 25×
- State v. ClevengerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1921-11-29· cited 25×
- State v. BrownNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1997-05-08· cited 24×
- State v. RichardsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-11-21· cited 24×
- Pueblo de Puerto Rico v. MárquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1945-01-09· cited 19×
- State v. BriganceNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1926-06-29· cited 18×
- State v. ShultsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-12-07· cited 17×
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1955-10-19· cited 16×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1914-08-17· cited 154×
- Green v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court· 1898-12-07· cited 45×
- State v. DusenberrySupreme Court of Missouri· 1892-11-15· cited 44×
- State v. DudleySupreme Court of Iowa· 1910-06-14· cited 43×
- Holcombe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1908-10-26· cited 37×
- State v. PollardSupreme Court of Missouri· 1903-05-19· cited 24×
- State v. SimmonsWashington Supreme Court· 1909-03-09· cited 23×
- Cunningham v. StateIllinois Supreme Court· 1904-06-23· cited 22×
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1908-12-21· cited 21×
- State v. StewartWashington Supreme Court· 1909-03-03· cited 14×
- Trimble v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1903-03-20· cited 10×
- State v. LattinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1860-10-15· cited 10×
- Duncan v. HolderNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1910-02-28· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.