Supreme Court of Missouri· 7/21/1992

State v. Parker

Citations

836 S.W.2d 930
1992 Mo. LEXIS 112
1992 WL 168802

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting restoration \better protects the equal protection rights of defendants and venirepersons and facilitates the efficient administration of justice\
noting the United States Supreme Court dispensed with such requirement in Powers v. Ohio, 499 U.S. 400 (1991), because Batson challenges are to protect not only the defendant’s equal protection rights but those of the venireperson as well
State’s failure to use all of its peremptory strikes to remove venirepersons of racial minority or presence of racial minority members on jury are relevant “only to the extent that they indicate that race was not the prosecutor’s motive for the challenged strikes”
preferring restoration to maximize \judicial time and resources\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Covington, Robertson, Holstein, Thomas, Benton, Price, Prewitt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

214 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.