Supreme Court of Missouri· 10/27/2009

State v. Taylor

Citations

298 S.W.3d 482
2009 Mo. LEXIS 530
2009 WL 3444958

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a trial court did not err by admitting evidence relating to test results disclosed shortly before trial when the record did not reveal the State's bad faith and the defendant was provided additional time for discovery and to prepare on account of the disclosure
counsel obtained continuances over objection of defendant to prepare for trial; lengthy delay; defendant effectively asserted constitutional right to speedy trial; no violation of Sixth Amendment
detective’s statement did not vouch for witness’s credibility when detective stated a witness was “right”
“Non-preserved issues are reviewed for plain error, if the error resulted in manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice.”
counsel obtained continuances over objection of defendant to prepare for trial; lengthy delay; defendant effectively asserted constitutional right to speedy trial; no violation of Sixth Amendment
counsel obtained continuances over objection of defendant to prepare for trial; lengthy delay; defendant effectively asserted constitutional right to speedy trial; no violation of Sixth Amendment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

112 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

51 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.