Callahan v. Cardinal Glennon Hospital

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[sjince there was no objection to the testimony of plaintiffs experts, there is no issue of admissibility presented and none is preserved for appeal”
• holding that “intervening causes . . . may cut off liability”
• explaining that “but for” causation means that “ 'the defendant’s conduct is a cause’ of the event if the event would not have occurred ‘but for’ that conduct”
• stating that “discussion concerning the semantics of causation is less important in Missouri than in most jurisdiction because under MAI we do not use the terms 1
• explaining that Missouri jury instructions “do not use the terms 1
• discussing approaches to causation under the Restatement (Second) of Torts and under Prosser and Keeton on Torts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).