Tennessee Supreme Court· 5/18/1992

State v. Crump

Citations

834 S.W.2d 265
1992 Tenn. LEXIS 358

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the mere failure to administer warnings, as opposed to a failure to honor invocation of rights, is not itself a Fifth Amendment violation
holding that questioning was improper even though the questioning officer was unaware of a defendant‘s previous invocation of the right to remain silent
holding that a refusal to honor the right to remain silent, “by definition, is of constitutional magnitude”
holding that a refusal to honor the right to remain silent, “by definition, is of constitutional magnitude”
holding failure of police to “scrupulously honor” the defendant’s invocation of his right to remain silent is a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights to be free of compelled self-incrimination, not merely a violation of Miranda’s procedural rules
T don’t have anything to say” was sufficient to invoke the right to remain silent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anderson, Reid, Daughtrey, Drowota, O'Brien

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Crump

62 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.