Tennessee Supreme Court· 1/2/2009

State v. Dailey

Citations

273 S.W.3d 94
2009 Tenn. LEXIS 1
2009 WL 7895

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the delay was deliberate despite the fact that officers testified that they did not provide Miranda rights because they were not yet arresting the suspect based on the following factors: (1
concluding that the Defendant’s second confession was inadmissible because the late Miranda warnings, which were given after the Defendant’s initial unwarned confession, were not effective to inform him that he had an opportunity to remain silent
concluding defendant was in custody and that questioning was accusatory although the officers’ “tone of voice and general demeanor were conversational”
weighing in favor of custody that “[t]he character of the questioning was accusatory and demanding, aimed at convincing the Defendant that the police already had sufficient evidence to convict him of murdering the victim and that he had to give them an explanation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornelia A. Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.