State v. Crump
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 2574
Syllabus
R.C. 2921.31 — R.C. 2921.29(A)(1) — OBSTRUCTING OFFICIAL BUSINESS — FAILING TO PROVIDE PERSONAL INFORMATION — EVIDENCE: Defendant's conviction under R.C. 2921.31 for obstructing official business was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence defendant's hindrance of a police investigation into the welfare of his daughter, who appeared injured and complained of pain, was not privileged conduct. Defendant's conviction under R.C. 2921.29(A)(1) for failing to provide personal information was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence, which showed a recalcitrant father, in the process of disciplining a child with a visible injury, who failed to provide his street address to an officer seeking that information during a well-founded investigation into whether the father had inflicted the child's injury.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- State v. IshmailOhio Supreme Court· 1978-06-21· cited 940×
- State v. StarcherOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-10· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.