New Mexico Supreme Court· 4/26/1971

State v. Crump

Citations

484 P.2d 329
82 N.M. 487

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that other sexual acts committed by the defendant were not independent of the charged crime, provided an explanation for the crime, and were incidental to it
holding that other criminal acts committed by 11 the defendant against the same victim were admissible where they were not 12 independent of the charged crime, provided an explanation of the crime, and were 13 incidental to it
“[The defendant] could hardly have suffered anxiety and concern over the charges before he was returned to New Mexico, when he claims to have first learned of the charges.”
acts that are part of transaction for which defendant is being tried are admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Oman, Compton, Steppienson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.