Supreme Court of New Jersey· 7/3/1986

State v. Hartley

Citations

511 A.2d 80
103 N.J. 252
1986 N.J. LEXIS 1265

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that the state law privilege against self-incrimination exceeds the protections provided under the Fifth Amendment
concluding that failure by police to re-administer Miranda warnings before interrogating an accused who has previously invoked the right to remain silent constitutes a failure to scrupulously honor the assertion
imposing “ ‘bright-line,’ inflexible, minimum requirement” that Miranda warnings be freshly administered to previously-warned suspect prior to resumption of custodial interrogation
referring to State's \heavy burden\ of proof (quoting Miranda, supra, 384 U.S. at 444, 475, 86 S.Ct. at 1612, 1628, 16 L.Ed. 2d at 707, 724)
referring to State’s “heavy burden” of proof (quoting Miranda, supra, 384 U.S. at 444, 475, 86 S.Ct. at 1612, 1628, 16 L.Ed. 2d at 707, 724)
noting the trial judge \focused solely upon defendant's waiver\ and failed to make \the critical inquiry\ of whether his rights had been scrupulously honored

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clifford, Handler, Stein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

97 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

97 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.