Skip to main content

State v. Crump

Citations

  • 637 P.2d 1232
  • 97 N.M. 177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that reopening proper for prosecution's expert to explain technical terms used
  • holding that reopening proper for prosecution’s expert to explain technical terms used
  • stating that the trial judge “must not forget his judicial function by assuming the role of advocate or by taking a partisan stance”
  • asserting that judge “should not show bias or feeling” in interrogation of witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easley, Payne, Riordan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.