Skip to main content

State v. Brown

Citations

  • 272 Or. App. 424
  • 355 P.3d 216
  • 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 880

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that it was not plain error to admit challenged evidence without a Leistiko instruction
  • explaining that danger of prejudice from \other acts\ evidence can be mitigated by the use of proper jury instructions
  • holding that a limiting instruction can mitigate risk of unfair prejudice
  • explaining that danger of prejudice from “other acts” evidence can be mitigated by the use of proper jury instruc- tions
  • objections about similarity of acts or prejudice versus probative value did not preserve issue about failure to give Leistiko instruction
  • In light of State v. Williams, 357 Or 1, 346 P3d 455 (2015), “our analysis departs from our previous case law resolving questions under OEC 404(3).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devore, Garrett, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.