· 9/9/2009
State v. Borck
Citations
- 216 P.3d 915
- 230 Or. App. 619
- 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1361
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court’s exclusion of part of the letters the defendant sought to exclude “evince [d] a conscious, nuanced consideration of the unfairly prejudicial potential of certain aspects of the letters’ content”
- considering the totality of attendant circumstances
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Rosenblum, Sercombe
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.