Skip to main content
· 9/9/2009

State v. Borck

Citations

  • 216 P.3d 915
  • 230 Or. App. 619
  • 2009 Ore. App. LEXIS 1361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • court’s exclusion of part of the letters the defendant sought to exclude “evince [d] a conscious, nuanced consideration of the unfairly prejudicial potential of certain aspects of the letters’ content”
  • considering the totality of attendant circumstances

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Rosenblum, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.