Court of Appeals of Oregon· 6/15/2011
State v. Wilson
Citations
- 259 P.3d 1004
- 243 Or. App. 464
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 840
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- sentencing court can consider a defendant's diminished mental capacity in determining whether a mandatory minimum sentence is constitutional
- judge’s colloquy “more closely resembles the thinking out loud of a judge struggling with a troubling and difficult decision that is not susceptible to [nor intended to be subjected to] the kind of analysis that we apply to statutes or written judicial opinions”
- reviewing trial court’s application of sentencing statutes for legal error
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schuman, Wollheim, Nakamoto
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. SpencerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2013-05-02· cited 43×
- State v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-24· cited 22×
- State v. SanderlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-24· cited 10×
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-10-10· cited 6×
- State v. AmbillCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-14· cited 5×
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-26· cited 1×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.