Court of Appeals of Oregon· 3/18/2015
State v. McMullin
Citations
- 269 Or. App. 859
- 346 P.3d 611
- 2015 Ore. App. LEXIS 334
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- OEC 403 balancing was not preserved where the defendant neither sought a ruling nor objected to the admission of the evidence at issue on those grounds at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flynn, Lagesen, Muniz, Sen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. ConradCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-24· cited 22×
- State v. ClarkeDeschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-07· cited 10×
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-29· cited 9×
- State v. ZavalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-02· cited 5×
- State v. HoltWasco County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 4×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Purcell v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-04-22· cited 31×
- State Ex Rel. Caleb v. BeesleyOregon Supreme Court· 1997-11-28· cited 31×
- Purcell v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-07-15· cited 18×
- State v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-02-11· cited 5×
- State v. RasconCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.