Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/17/2019

State v. Link

Citations

441 P.3d 664
297 Or. App. 126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the murder review hearing, in its current form, cannot cure a Miller violation
concluding that a “court cannot impose the state’s most severe penalties on a juvenile offender without regard for the unique quali- ties of youth that might make imposition of that sentence inappropriate”
discussing the Supreme Court’s observations in Roper and Graham about the differences between juveniles and adults
determining the imposition of a mandatory minimum sentence of life with the possibility of parole on a juvenile homicide offender without an individualized sentencing hearing was unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment
explaining how adoption of Measure 11 extin- guished the role of the juvenile court in determining whether certain-aged youths charged with certain offenses would be tried in adult court or adjudicated in juvenile court
limiting “Miller’s applicability . . . [to] the most serious penalties”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Devore, James, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

115 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.