State v. Meyers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the record adequately supported the trial court’s decision “notwithstanding the fact that the court did not expressly follow the Mayfield analysis”
• decision to admit or exclude evidence on OEC 403 grounds reviewed for abuse of discretion
• court did not follow Mayfield analysis on the record but record was adequate to determine that trial court properly exercised discretion
• court did not follow State v. Mayfield, 302 Or 631, 645, 733 P2d 438 (1987) analysis on the record but record was adequate to determine that trial court properly exercised discretion
• trial court’s decision under OEC 403 is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• trial court's decision under OEC 403 is reviewed for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Conrad
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-24· cited 22×
• State v. Arellano
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-07-02· cited 21×
• State v. Phelps
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-06-26· cited 18×
• State v. Wert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-11-20· cited 8×
• Farmers Insurance v. Munson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-12-31· cited 8×
• State v. Gonzalez-Sanchez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-23· cited 7×
• State v. Knight
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-06· cited 3×
• State v. Corbin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-12-23· cited 2×